Subscribe to receive weekly emails of the Reasons for Hope blog.

* indicates required

What is the scientific evidence that the sky is solid?

Juan responds to the claim Dr. Hector Avalos made that the sky is solid.  Does the Bible say that?
By Juan Valdes,  Reasons for Hope
In his opening statements, Dr. Avalos asked me three specific questions and I want to tackle them in order. Having answered the first question regarding the creation of everything from water, let’s focus on the second question, “What is the scientific evidence that the sky is solid?” The essence of his argument was that the Bible advocates a cosmological model that includes a solid dome as the sky, something clearly incompatible with modern scientific cosmological models. Therefore, the Genesis account of the origins of our world are not scientifically reasonable. In support of this argument, Dr. Avalos spent considerable time and numerous presentation slides establishing a series of “supporting facts” that I intend to respond to, though it will take an equally lengthy response. However, prior to any refutation of his argument, we must first understand the basis of his argument.  
His argument was based on several points as follow. First, he argued that the Hebrew word ‘raqia’ translated “firmament” means a solid dome as it appears in Genesis 1:6-7, “6 Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” 7 Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.” (NKJV). He also argues a bit later that the Septuagint (Greek) translation of ‘raqia,’ the Greek noun ‘stereoma’ also means “a solid body”  Second, he misquotes a verse in Job 37:18 that he claims is speaking of a solid dome, “Can you, like him, hammer out the skies, hard as a molten mirror?” (RSV).
 Third, Dr. Avalos argues that the solid dome was a common belief amongst Christians in biblical times. To prove his point he quotes the pseudepedigraphic 3rd century book of 3 Baruch 3:7 and a quote from St. Augustine where he supposedly affirms his belief in the solid dome as well.  Fourth, Dr. Avalos presents the NRSV translation of Genesis 1:16-17, “God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars.  God set them in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth,” which does in fact support his hypothesis well. Finally, he presents Egyptian and Greek mythology as the sources of the solid dome cosmology that he argues was copied and believed by the writers of Genesis.
At first glance the argument seems very strong, but upon close examination of each supporting point, it turns out to be quite weak.  So let’s deal with it!
The first problem with Dr. Avalos’ argument is that his definition of ‘raqia’ is too narrow. With his knowledge of the Hebrew language, he is well aware but fails to inform us that the word is translated quite differently by many expert linguists. As a matter of fact, the major Hebrew lexicons and Hebrew dictionaries ALL provide a definition that includes “expanse” as well as “firmament.” Herein lies the problem, which word more closely reflects the meaning as it was intended by the original author and as it was understood by the original audience?  OBVIOUSLY the words firmament and expanse have quite different meanings in our modern day English.  The translation problem is obvious when one compares translations. The KJV translates ‘raqia’ as firmament all 17 times the word appears in the Old Testament, while the NASB translates it as expanse all 17 times.  The word ‘raqia’ appears nine (9) times in Genesis 1 and a survey of 40 different translations shows how divided translators are regarding the word just in Genesis 1:6-8, 14-15, 17 and 20.
Translations that favor a view of ‘raqia’ as open sky.  (17)
Translations that favor a view of ‘raqia’ as a solid dome. (17)
Translations that include several possible views of ‘raqia’ in Genesis 1. (6)
The plethora of the aforementioned translation variations highlights the difficulty faced by Bible translators in dealing with ancient documents. Further difficulty results from the fact that everyone has a bias, even Bible translators. This is something translators must constantly keep in check, but unfortunately they aren’t always successful. Thus it is important to keep in mind that there is no perfect translation of the Bible. The perfect text was the original autographs inspired by God and written by servants of His choice.  Thus, it is imperative to seek out the meaning intended by God, primarily in the Genesis passages under consideration, by examining the original language, not other translations.
In response to Dr. Avalos’ first line of evidence, I will argue that “expansion” is the most acceptable translation for ‘raqia.’ Furthermore, I will argue that “firmament” is a very unfortunate mis-translation that occurred early enough in the history of Bible translations to contaminate many future translations.  Why is “expansion” the best translation? There are various reasons, but the primary reason is God’s omniscience.  Once we accept that the Bible is God’s Word, than we must approach it with the certainty that He knows all things. Thus, His revelation will be forever relevant and true.
 God would not reveal to his people a mythological conception of creation.
 Furthermore, there are other, more specific Hebrew words that could have been used to describe a solid metal dome but they are not employed in the text.  In addition, the meaning of the word ‘raqia’ as well as the syntax of the verses where it is used in Genesis clearly points away from a solid dome interpretation. Thompson explains,
“Raqia denotes simply an expanse, not a solid structure (see Harris, et al., 1980, 2:2218). Furthermore, the actual substance of the expanse is not inherent in the word. Numbers 16:38 juxtaposes raqia and pahim (plates), suggesting literally an “expanse of plates.” Here, “plates” specifies the actual material involved in the expansion. In Genesis, “heavens,” not solid matter, is given as the nature of the expanse (Genesis 1:8,14,15,17,20). The original context in which raqia is used does not imply any kind of solid dome above the Earth.
 [emphasis in original]
That is why ‘expansion’ is the most reasonable translation of ‘raqia.’  But, what about ‘firmament?’  Why should it be considered an unfortunate mis-translation?  Dr. Avalos and others make a big deal about the prefix “FIRM” being sufficient evidence that the word is referring to a solid or hard dome. There are numerous problems with this line of reasoning. First, the word in Hebrew is not ‘firmament’ it is ‘raqia’ and ‘raqia’ does not have a prefix that means solid or hard. Second, the word ‘firmament’ should never have found itself in any translation. Again, I defer to Thompson who gives us an outstanding explanation,
The Septuagint (a translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek produced by Jewish scholars in the third centuy B.C. at the behest of the Egyptian pharaoh, Ptolemy Philadelphus, for inclusion in his world-famous library in Alexandria) translated raqia into the Greek as stereoma, which connotes a “solid structure” (Arndt and Gingrich, 1967, p. 774). Apparently, the translators of the Septuagint were influenced by the then-popular Egyptian view of cosmology and astronomy [they were, after all, doing their translating in Egypt for an Egyptian pharaoh] that embraced the notion of the heavens being a stone vault. Unfortunately, those Hebrew scholars therefore chose to render raqia via the Greek word stereoma—in order to suggest a firm, solid structure. The Greek connotation thus influenced Jerome to the extent that, when he produced his Latin Vulgate, he used the word firmamentum (meaning a strong or steadfast support—from which the word “firmament” is transliterated) to reflect this pagan concept (McKechinie, 1978, p. 691).
  [emphasis in original]
When Bible translators work off of translations they are bound to copy errors into their new translations. When translating Genesis, the Hebrew text would be the place to begin, not a Greek translation influenced by a pagan pharaoh. Furthermore, what makes this mis-translation tragic is the profound impact that both the Septuagint and the Latin Vulgate translations have had on many future translators, who have simply adopted the term ‘firmament’ and propagated the mistake. This leads to the issue of mythological cosmologies and their influence on the Biblical account of Creation.
Dr. Avalos argues that the Egyptian and Greek mythological cosmologies provided a common understanding of Genesis among Christians until the Copernican Revolution, where science demonstrated that Genesis could not be taken as a literal scientific explanation of origins. His supporting evidence is both weak and irrelevant.  Even to imply that a 3rd Century AD pseudepedigraphal book such as 3 Baruch was representative of Christianity is ludicrous. It doesn’t form part of neither the Jewish nor the Christian canons. Furthermore, the book describes five (5) “heavens” where the just are transformed into birds and the wicked are turned into demons and punished in heaven as well.  3 Baruch is obviously not representative of the biblical Christian worldview.  Actually, the author is believed to have been a gnostic, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, “He must have been one of the Gnostics, who revered equally the Haggadah, Greek mythology, and Oriental wisdom.”
  Obviously 3 Baruch is completely irrelevant to the argument—it does not prove that ‘firmament’ is a valid translation of Genesis nor does it establish that Christians believed in a solid dome.
As a second example, Dr. Avalos argues that St. Augustine, the respected theologian, believed in a solid dome sky.  While Augustine is not considered a representative of all of Christianity, the argument merits a response. Augustine is quoted in a presentation slide as saying, “Our picture of heaven as a vault, even when taken in a literal sense, does not contradict the theory that heaven is a sphere.”[emphasis by Dr. Avalos].  The quote is hardly a clear declaration of belief in a solid dome sky.  When read in context, Augustine goes on to state that he interprets Genesis in an allegorical manner. He is hardly dogmatic in the work cited. As a matter of fact in the following two chapters he argues that there are problems with believing in a solid dome—primarily how to explain the moving stars, sun and moon if they are fixed to a solid dome. However, the real question is, how this is even relevant to whether or not the sky is a solid dome?  It could easily be argued that Augustine was influenced by both the Septuagint and the Vulgate mis-translation; and he probably was, but that is irrelevant. From a purely philosophical perspective, who or how many people believe something has no bearing on the truthfulness of a claim. Even if every Christian believed it was in fact a solid dome, it would not alter reality. Heaven is obviously not a solid dome and anyone who has accepted that theory has been wrong—but their error IS NOT based on God’s revelation in Genesis 1—instead, it is based on a mis-translation and/or pagan influence.
Prior to concluding this response, we still need to deal with two other supporting arguments presented by Dr. Avalos. First, does the passage in Job 37:18 teach that the sky is a solid dome? Let’s look at it again, “Can you, like him, hammer out the skies, hard as a molten mirror?” (RSV). Let us begin by establishing that Elihu is speaking and not God. Not only have Job’s friends been wrong about the cause of Job’s affliction, but God himself rejects their entire argument just a few verses later, “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?” (Job 38:2 NASB). Also, notice that Dr. Avalos mistakenly quotes the RSV as using the verb “hammer out” which it does not do. Notice how the verb ‘raqa’ is translated across the various translations:
Furthermore, the context of Elihu’s speech is God’s control of the weather.  I think the New American Commentary on Job unpacks this verse perfectly, “Elihu’s final query to Job once more challenged his ability to effect change in the weather. Having reminded him of the agony that the heat had brought, he asked if he could do anything about those brazen skies, spread out like a mirror, intensifying the torrid rays of a blazing summer sun.”
 More can be said about this verse, but suffice it to say the poetic language communicated by Elihu does not establish the sky to be a solid dome.  
Our final point is Dr. Avalos’ reference to the NRSV translation of Genesis 1:16-17, “God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars.  God set them in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth.” For the aforementioned reasons, the NRSV adopts the mis-translation view of the Septuagint and thus superimposes on the text an idea that was foreign to both Moses and the people of his time. When we consider the same passage translated using the original meaning of ‘raqia’ as it reads in the NASB, “God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also. God placed them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth,” [emphasis added] the editorial decision to impose the mythological cosmology into the text is gone and the text makes perfect scientific sense.
In Conclusion
Dr. Avalos’ selection of translations and supporting evidence is a testament to his worldview. As I stated in my opening statements of the debate, in order to understand the root of our differences one must understand that both Dr. Avalos and I have intellectual commitments to very divergent foundational presuppositions. Underlying our debate there is a big picture that accounts for our differences regarding the issue we are debating and a plethora of other issues.  
At their core—our differences stem from our beliefs about the God of the Bible. Dr. Avalos presupposes the non-existence of the God of the Bible and I presuppose His existence. As we develop our respective foundational presuppositions, we edify intellectual frameworks for our ideas and build an entire ideology or worldview that seems to us as the most reasonable way to understand reality. Nowhere is this more evident than the way we approach the Bible. Because there is no God from Dr. Avalos’ perspective—he approaches the Bible, at best, as just another book meriting no special treatment. On the other hand, because I believe there is a God and He authored the Bible, I approach it as a UNIQUE, one-of-a-kind book where God reveals himself to mankind. Because of his approach, Dr. Avalos considers the Bible to be an “ancient relic” full of errors, contradictions, and absolutely irrelevant when it comes to modern science. Because of my approach, I consider the Bible to be the INERRANT, INSPIRED Word of God that is fully reliable and ETERNALLY RELEVANT even when it comes to science.
There is no denying that Egyptian and Greek mythology had a profound impact on the world for numerous centuries. Further, there is no denying that the mis-translation of ‘raqia’ in the Septuagint had a profound impact as well. However, God was not misled by the error in translation nor was He influenced by the Egyptian and Greek mythologies when He inspired Moses to write the words of Genesis 1. The Bible does not teach the mythological cosmology that the Septuagint translators and Dr. Avalos have tried to attribute to it. Thus the apparently strong case presented by Dr. Avalos turns out to be very weak.
In response to this paper, the best Dr. Avalos could do would be to try to defend the Septuagint translation based on his “language expertise,” but I would caution the reader to just take a look at the wide variety of translations listed above and take it as a testament that hundreds of scholars that have been chosen to be on Bible translation committees for their expertise have patently disagreed with Dr. Avalos’ interpretation of the text.
Regarding our question, the Word of God is clear—God created the expanse of the heavens, not a solid dome with the sun, moon and stars attached to it. Nor does Genesis attempt to present that view.  Therefore, the question itself is invalid, because it is asking us to give evidence for a solid dome that is not part of our Bible or our creation model.  
 [footnotes below]
For those who did not see the Avalos/Valdes Debate, view it here.
(Sign up in the email sign-up box at top of page for updates about the debate)
1 Dr. Avalos’ presentation misquotes the RSV, “Can you, like him, hammer out the skies, hard as a molten mirror.” The phrase “hammer out” does not appear in the RSV, as per Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1946, 1952, and 1971 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. There is no need to respond to this point, since it is probably a just a careless mistake.
2No scientific discovery will ever contradict God’s revelation, because true science is the study of that which God has created. God is the only one who was there in the beginning and we can trust Him when He tells us what He did and how he did it.
3 I’m well aware that this reason is completely irrelevant to someone whose worldview posits the non-existence of God.
4 Bert Thompson, Ph.D “What was firmament of Genesis 1?”   Accessed, 2/21/2014. Note: Dr. Thompson’s reference to  ‘Harris, et al., 1980, 2:2218’ is footnoted in the original article as:  Harris, R. Laird, Gleason Archer, Jr. and Bruce Waltke, eds. (1980), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago, IL: Moody).
5 Ibid.
6 Jewish Encyclopedia, “Apocalypse of Baruch” (Greek).   Accessed 2/22/2014
7 Alden, R. L. (1993). Job (Vol. 11, p. 363). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
8 Please note that this paper is not meant as an attack on any of the mentioned translations of the Bible. I believe most Bible translators care and are cautious in their approach to the sacred task of translating. Nevertheless, sometimes translators make poor choices. There is no perfect translation, therefore my advice to those who cannot go back to the original languages, is to always compare various translations regarding the passage you wish to understand.
Posted in
Tagged with





1 Chronicles 16:8-12 1 Chronicles 22:14 1 Chronicles 29:11 1 Corinthians 10:31 1 Corinthians 13 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 1 Corinthians 15:21 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 1 Corinthians 15:33 1 Corinthians 15:57 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 1 Corinthians 9:26-27 1 John 2:15-17 1 John 2:15 1 John 2:2 1 John 4:10 1 John 4:19 1 John 4:7-8 1 Peter 1:23 1 Peter 2:24 1 Peter 3:15 1 Peter 3:18 1 Peter 4:12-13 1 Peter 4:12-19 1 Peter 5:10 1 Thessalonians 5:11 1 Timothy 4:8 1 Timothy 6:10 1 Timothy 6:3-10 1 corinthians 10:13 100 miles 100% human 1Peter 1:17-21 2 Chronicles 9:13-29 2 Corinthians 12:9-10 2 Corinthians 12:9-11 2 Corinthians 12:9 2 Corinthians 1:3-4 2 Corinthians 1:3-6 2 Corinthians 1:3 2 Corinthians 3:17 2 Corinthians 4:16-18 2 Corinthians 5:21 2 Corinthians 6:18 2 Peter 3:9 2 Samuel 23:8-12 2 Samuel 6:17 2 Thessalonians 3:3 2 Timothy 1:7 2 Timothy 2:15 2 Timothy 2:25 2 Timothy 2:7 2 Timothy 3:12 2 Timothy 3:16-17 2 Timothy 4:11 25% are staying 50k 55-mile race AI Abraham sacrificing Isaac Abraham was very rich. Abuja Acts 11 Acts 13 and 15 Acts 17:11 Acts 17:22-34 Acts 17 Acts 1:8 Acts 5:38-39 Acts 9 Albert Einstein All great men were born in February. Alyssa Glander America waited too long. Apostle Peter Asbury Barabbas Barna poll Barnabas Baruch Bulla Be a Berean Be bold! Be bold Be happy! Be part of the process. Be still and know that I am God Best Evidence God Created Bethlehem Bible reading Bible Biblical archaeology Bob Gillespie Brian Miller C.S. Lewis CRT Camp Sigel Candace Nordine Carl Kerby Jr. Carl Kerby Cell phones Choosing for Two Christ in me Christ opened my eyes. Christian Camps Christian witness Christian worldview Chruch Colossians 1:27 Colossians 2:14 Colossians 2:8 Colossians 3:17-23 Colossians 3:17 Colossians 3:1 Colossians 4:5-6 Columbo Tactic Creation Creator God D. Mark Jacobs Jr. Dan Lietha Daniel 12:4 Daniel 2:21 Dave Glander David Tautofi DeBunked 15 DeBunked TV DeBunked Deuteronomy 11:13 Deuteronomy 6:6-7 Deuteronomy 6:6-9 Deuteronomy 6:7 Did Jesus Commit Suicide? Dr. Andrew Fabich Dr. Francis Schaeffer Dr. Jason Lisle Dr. William Beal Draa Mackey EQUIP Easter Ecclesiastes 12:13 Ecclesiastes 3:11 Ecclesiastes 4:10 Eleazar Elohim Ephesians 1:13-14 Ephesians 2:8-9 Ephesians 3:12 Ephesians 3:17-18 Ephesians 3:19-21 Ephesians 3:20-21 Ephesians 4:29 Ephesians 5:15-16 Ephesians 5:15-17 Ephesians 6:10-18 Ephesians 6:12 Ephesians 6:4 Equip Retreat Exodus 17:11 Exodus 17:12 Exodus 20:11 Exodus 33:14 Facing the Giants Family dinner Fascinating Facts Frank Figueroa Gabby Terry Galatians 2:20 Galatians 5:1 Galatians 5:22-23 Galatians 6:7 Galatians 6:9 Gen Z Genesis 11:6 Genesis 13:1-2 Genesis 1:14-15 Genesis 1:14 Genesis 1:27 Genesis 1:29 Genesis 1:31 Genesis 22 Genesis 3:10 Genesis 3:12 Genesis 3:14-15 Genesis 3 Genesis and the Gospel Genesis Glad You Asked Christmas Edition Glad You Asked Glendive Montana Glory to God! God created you God is love. God is rich in mercy God loves us. God loves you God makes no mistakes. God won the battle God-created world God-shaped vacuum God's Word God's character God's dwelling place God's grace God's joy God's plan God's pursuit God\'s Word God\'s character God\'s joy God\'s plan God\'s pursuit God\\\'s character God\\\'s joy God\\\'s plan God\\\'s pursuit God\\\\\\\'s character God\\\\\\\'s joy God\\\\\\\'s plan God\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s character God\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s plan God\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s character God\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s plan Gods Word is truth Gods Word Gods care Gods character Gods divine plan Gods light Gods love story Gods plan of redemption Gods plan Gods wisdom Good Shepherd Gospel message Grace Mally Grace Moffitt Grammar matters Groggy Hallelujah! Hawaii He is always faithful. He is risen Heaven Hebrews 10:1-18 Hebrews 10:19-22 Hebrews 10:23 Hebrews 11 Hebrews 12:1-3 Hebrews 12 Hebrews 13:14 Hebrews 13:5-6 Hebrews 13:5 Hebrews 13:8 Hebrews 4:12 Hebrews 4:16 Hebrews 7:25 Hell His glory Holly Varnum Holy Spirit How can I fight and overcome fear? How to Think Hubble Human life is sacred. Huntsman Center Hurry sickness I Peter 3:15 IMPACT Impact Curriculum Is it okay for a Christian to be rich? Is life good? Isaiah 11:1 Isaiah 26:3-4 Isaiah 40:28-31 Isaiah 40:29 Isaiah 40:31 Isaiah 41:10 Isaiah 41 Isaiah 43:1 Isaiah 43:2 Isaiah 45:9a Isaiah 53:6 Isaiah 55:11 Isaiah 55:8-9 Isaiah 55:8 Isaiah 64:8 Isaiah 7:14 Isaiah 9:6 Israel Museum It is well with my soul Jamaica James 1:12 James 1:15 James 1:17 James 1:2 James 4:10 James 4:14 James 4:7 James 4:8 January 2022 Jehovah Rapha Jeremiah 17:9 Jeremiah 29:11 Jeremiah 29:13 Jeremiah 31:3 Jeremiah 33:3 Jeremiah 36:32 Jerusalem Jesus and me Jesus chose to die. Jesus comforts the broken-hearted. Jesus saw their faith Jesus the Messiah Jesus Jewish feasts Job 1:3 Job 2:8 John 10:10 John 10:11 John 10:17-18 John 10:27 John 11:25 John 14:1-3 John 14:6 John 15:1-11 John 15:13 John 15:16a John 16:33 John 1:12 John 1:35-42 John 3:16-17 John 3:16 John 3:17 John 6:51 John 8:32 John 8:36 John Mark John Ray Joni Eareckson Tada Joni and Friends Joseph A. Kennedy Joseph and Mary Joseph Joshua 1:9 Joshua 22:5 Joshua 24:15 Juan Valdes Jude 1:22 Julaine Appling Justice Kaimuki Bulldogs Kaimuki High School King David King Hezekiah King Solomon Know It! Live It! Share It! Know why you believe. LEAD Wisconsin Lacey Reitz Lamentations 3:22-23 Lamentations 3:22-24 Leviticus 12:8 Leviticus 18:24-30 Leviticus 25:23 Liberty Institute Life in layers Life is good because God is good. Life is good Listen to His voice. Listen Little boys need Mamas. Little boys need to know their Mamas like them. Loose the Lion Luke 12:12 Luke 18:1 Luke 1:32 Luke 22:32 Luke 24:38 Luke 2:1-14 Luke 2:24 Luke 2:55 Luke 2:7 Luke 5:1-11 Luke 5:37-39 MTD Malachi 3:3 Malachi 3:6 Mark 10:45 Mark 10:8 Mark 16:15 Mark 1:16-18 Mark 2:3-5 Mark 5:19 Mark 6:31 Martin Luther Mary Master Potter Matthew 10:20 Matthew 10:32 Matthew 11:28-29 Matthew 11:28-30 Matthew 11:28 Matthew 11:29-30 Matthew 11:29 Matthew 13 Matthew 14:22-33 Matthew 14:31 Matthew 16:24 Matthew 19:16-24 Matthew 19:23-24 Matthew 1:22-23 Matthew 24:35 Matthew 27:15-25 Matthew 27:75 Matthew 28:18-20 Matthew 4:18-20 Matthew 5:13 Matthew 5:16 Matthew 5:18 Matthew 6:19-20 Matthew 6:19-21 Matthew 6:19 Matthew 6:25-26 Matthew 6:27 Matthew 6:33 Matthew 9:35 May 15 1987 Memory Lane Mere Christianity Messiah Mic'd Up Mic'dUP Mic\'d Up Mic\'dUP Mic\\\'d Up Mic\\\\\\\'d Up Mic\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'d Up Micah 5:2 Micah 6:8 Michigan State University Miracles Money is their god. Moralistic Therapeutic Deism Mosaic NRB National Religious Broadcasters Never Forget. Never Again. New Year's resolutions New Year\'s resolutions Nigeria Noah's ark Nonconformity Not yet a human. Parable of the sower Pastor Baba Paul Varnum Peter Philippians 1:6 Philippians 2:13 Philippians 2:3-4 Philippians 2:6-11 Philippians 3:12-16 Philippians 3:7-8 Philippians 4:13 Philippians 4:6-7 Philippians 4:6-9 Philippians 4:8 Pilate Plan C Please say Yes! Please say "Yes!" Please say \"Yes!\" Please say \\\"Yes!\\\" Pool of Siloam Potter Pray for Rachael Neal. Proverbs 12:26 Proverbs 14:12 Proverbs 14:34 Proverbs 15:4 Proverbs 16:3 Proverbs 18:12 Proverbs 18:24 Proverbs 19:21 Proverbs 1:20 Proverbs 1:8-9 Proverbs 22:6 Proverbs 23:19-21 Proverbs 27:17 Proverbs 3:5-6 Proverbs 3:5 Proverbs 3;5-6 Proverbs 6:16-19 Psalm 100:5 Psalm 100 Psalm 103:2-5 Psalm 119:105 Psalm 119:11 Psalm 119:160 Psalm 122:1 Psalm 138:1-2 Psalm 139:14 Psalm 139:17 Psalm 139 Psalm 13:6 Psalm 147:4 Psalm 16:11 Psalm 18:1-2 Psalm 18:30 Psalm 19:1 Psalm 1:1 Psalm 1 Psalm 23:1 Psalm 23:2 Psalm 23:4 Psalm 23:6 Psalm 27 Psalm 29:2 Psalm 2:1-6 Psalm 31:14-15 Psalm 34:19 Psalm 37:3-7 Psalm 37:5-6 Psalm 40:2 Psalm 40:8 Psalm 42 Psalm 63:3 Psalm 68:19 Psalm 69:9a Psalm 8:3 Psalm 8:4 Psalm 92:1-4 Pursued Put God first Rachael Neal Reasons for Hope Responds Reasons for Hope in the Mosaic of Your Life Reasons for Hope* Reasons for Hope Rebekah Haynie Respond to God's voice Respond to God\'s voice Respond to God\\\'s voice Respond to God\\\\\\\'s voice Respond to God\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s voice Resurrection Revelation 19:11 Revelation 22:18-19 Revelation 7:9-11 RforH Romans 10:14 Romans 10:15 Romans 10:9-10 Romans 10:9 Romans 12:1-2 Romans 12:2 Romans 12:9-21 Romans 1:16 Romans 1:20 Romans 3:23 Romans 5:10-11 Romans 5:12 Romans 5:17 Romans 5:6-10 Romans 6:23 Romans 8:14 Romans 8:18-25 Romans 8:26 Romans 8:28 Romans 8:38-39 Sanctity of Life Schaftlein Report Scriptures Seal of Baruch September 11 Shelby Pruitt Spurgeon Stay bold! Stay bold Steve Herzig Supreme Court Surprised by Joy Testify Thanksgiving The Bible Project The Bible is a Jewish book. The DeBunked Files The Plumb Line The Right Ingredients The Screwtape Letters There is no truth There's Nothing Wrong with Abortion ... DeBunked! There\'s Nothing Wrong with Abortion ... DeBunked! There\\\'s Nothing Wrong with Abortion ... DeBunked! There\\\\\\\'s Nothing Wrong with Abortion ... DeBunked! Think before you post. Thinkful TikTok Tish Kerby Titus 2:6 Tower of Babel Trust His heart Trusting God Use God's Word correctly. Use God\'s Word correctly. WEF Wade Wacker Wash their feet. Wealthy Christians What are you thankful for? What is a Christian? What is my purpose? Who Made God? Why am I here? Why did Jesus have to die? Will Our Generation Speak? Within Our Reach Wooed Word of God Your grace still amazes me. Your vote matters. Yuval Noah Harari Zola Levitt a little at a time a process; not an event abortion absolute truth abundant life acacia accepting help achieving the impossible adventure angels angry another child of God struggling answering questions antidote to fear anxious apologetics artificial intelligence astronomy astrophysics atonement for sin be not afraid best of luck biblical Christianity biblical creationist biblical perspective biblical worldview biology blindfold boldness bold boys branch brokenness bullae bulla butterfly caged called to encourage cancellation cancer journey cancer cease striving certainty challenge character check your attitude children choices clay coercion come alongside comfort zone comfortable Christian commas save lives compromised confidence confused conjunction consequences created in Gods image creation vs. evolution critical race theory critical thinking cross curriculum cut the head off the snake debate deception defend depressed depression design of the eye desperate passion dinosaur dig distractions don't fight alone don't stop don\'t fight alone don\'t stop don\\\'t fight alone don\\\'t stop don\\\\\\\'t stop dont stop doubt eisegeses embryology encouragement entrusted by God to do good eternal life eternity without God eternity evangelism examine the scriptures exegesis eye fair and impartial faith walk family circle family first fear not fearfully and wonderfully made fear feeling lost feeling overwhelmed fig filled with joy and worship flight cancelled football coach forest forever home former athiest freedom of choice fruit fulfilled prophecies galaxies gestation give a defense give thanks glory in His holy name good luck good news of Jesus Christ good news good will toward men grace gratitude grog having conversations heavenly host hermeneutics heroes of the faith history of the universe hope human eye humble ourselves illness impact lives impact your teammates positively impulsive incomprehensible God inn isolation keep moving keep progressing largest church in the world layers leaf light year speed like Christ live in freedom loss of loved ones loss love of money love made for another world made in His image manger marriage memories memorization without application memorizing Scripture missing opportunities more like Christ multiple meanings mystical truth never compromised no coincidence no complaints no hope no pain no gain no place like home no quitting no room in the inn nonconformist not a fetus not ashamed oak objective right and wrong olive one foot in front of the other one-world government opened doors opportunity to bring hope overwhelming distance palms part of a team passionate patience patriotism paying it forward peace persecution persevere perspective physics plans pomegranate positive messages postgame prayer potsherd pottery potter power of the Word praying pregnancy pregnant preposition prioritize God pro-life progress propitiation providence quadriplegic quiet time reach the younger generation reality exists reality reassurance red cardinal redemptive work of Christ refining refocus what church looks like relationship with God relentless forward motion represent Christ resolutions rest revival right time right words root of all evil root sacrifice salvation see God move seed experiment seek the Lord shine a light silversmith situation slavery social media son of encouragement speak life speak your truth spiritual apathy spiritual harvest spotless Lamb of God stable stagnant church stand boldly on the Word of God stand up against evil star-gazing starstruck stars step by step stranded stress statistics stress study for yourself suffering swaddling clothes sycamore symbol of God's love and reassurance symbol of God\'s love and reassurance symbol of God\\\'s love and reassurance symbol of God\\\\\\\'s love and reassurance symbol of Gods love and reassurance teaching science technology teens telescope temple of the Holy Spirit terebinth thank you thankfulness thankful the apple of his eye the finish line the lion will defend itself the seeing eye theology think for yourself thriving in Christ traditions traffic trees trials tribulation troubles trust Jesus truth turn to God ultamarathon ultrarunner unborn child uncage the Lion uncertain uncover the truth unfair universe unpredictable use your gift vine virgin birth visual reminders vote wethering the storm where two worlds collide willow windows to the soul wonder of boys work ethic worldview worth fighting for worth it worthy of protection young earth your circle matters youth ministry youth zeal for worship zoo guide